The Goal Subscale Epistemology was also a significant predictor of therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Goal subscale (e.g. client and therapist agreement on how to achieve the goals), F(2, 1093) = 4.92, p < .007 (R 2 = .009). 065) for the rationalist epistemology t(1093) = 2.16, p < .031, was in the positive direction. 075) for the constructivist epistemology t(1093) = 2.47, p < .014, was also in the positive direction along the Goal subscale. This was again inconsistent with the proposed hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings towards the Goal subscale in the therapist emphasis on working alliance compared to therapists with a constructivist epistemology.

The Bond Subscale Lastly, epistemology was also a significant predictor of the therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Bond subscale (the development of a personal bond between the client and therapist), F(2, 1089) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .035). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.034) was in the negative direction, but was not significant, t(1089) = –1.15, p < .249. For the constructivist epistemology, the standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.179) was significant t(1089) = 5.99, p < .0001, and in the positive direction along the Bond subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology is less inclined towards therapist emphasis on working alliance on the Bond subscale than the constructivist epistemology.

Practitioners that have an excellent constructivist epistemology tended to put a lot more increased exposure of the non-public thread from the therapeutic relationship as compared to therapists with a beneficial rationalist epistemology

The modern research showed that therapist epistemology try a significant predictor with a minimum of some aspects of the functional alliance. The best selecting was a student in relation to the introduction of a good individual bond between the customer and you can specialist (Thread subscale). It supporting the notion throughout the literature one constructivist therapists lay a greater emphasis on strengthening a quality therapeutic relationships characterized by, “invited, wisdom, faith, and you will caring.

Theory step three-your choice of Particular Healing Treatments

The 3rd and final investigation was created to target the anticipate one epistemology could well be a good predictor of specialist use of particular therapy techniques. A great deal more especially, that the rationalist epistemology will declaration playing with procedure of intellectual behavioural cures (elizabeth.grams. guidance offering) more constructivist epistemologies, and you may therapists which have constructivist epistemologies will report using techniques associated with the constructivist cures (age.grams. emotional processing) more therapists having rationalist epistemologies). A parallel linear regression research are presented to choose in the event in deinen 40-er Dating Login the predictor adjustable (specialist epistemology) will influence counselor ratings of criterion parameters (medication process).

Epistemology was a significant predictor of cognitive behavioral therapy techniques F(2, 993) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .185). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = 0.430) was significant, t(993) = , p < .001 and in the positive direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.057) was significant and in the positive direction t(993) = 1.98, p < .05. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings of therapist use of cognitive behavioral techniques when conducting therapy than constructivist epistemologies.

Finally, epistemology was a significant predictor of constructivist therapy techniques F(2, 1012) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .138). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.297) was significant t(1012) = –, p < .0001 and in the negative direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.195) was significant t(1012) = 6.63, p < .0001, and in the positive direction. This supported the hypothesis that the constructivist epistemology would place a stronger emphasis on therapist use of constructivist techniques when conducting therapy than rationalist epistemologies.